Malekan vs. Valente: should chains roll back after the Binance hack?
The Defiant is putting Omid Malekan and Lorenzo Valente on a live X debate over whether blockchains should ever allow rollbacks. The Binance hack is the case study driving the argument. It is the immutability fight, argued out loud.
- Original source: X account @DefiantNews.
- The source published it on Nov 9, 2026 at 10:18 PM.
- No second outlet has reported it yet. Treat it as a single-source claim.
- It comes from X posts, not a news outlet.
The Defiant (@DefiantNews) is hosting a live debate on X between Omid Malekan and Lorenzo Valente. The question on the table: should chains allow rollbacks at all. The Binance hack is the case study the whole argument is built around.
A rollback would mean a chain reversing transactions already written to its ledger — the direct opposite of the immutability crypto runs on. That is the tension the session is built around, with the Binance hack as the live example both debaters have to answer for.
TopicsOmid Malekan · Lorenzo Valente · The Defiant · Binance · X
Source: x.com
Written by Paparazzi with AI. Not financial advice.
More stories
- Web3 & CryptoPartnershipx.com0viewsWLFI buybacks will route through Aster, World Liberty Financial says
- Web3 & CryptoHacktokenpost.com0viewsCrypto platforms kept processing Binance theft funds after FBI warning
- Web3 & Cryptox.com0viewsPeter Schiff warns Bitcoin crash risk after BTC slips under $75K
- Web3 & Cryptox.com0viewsHyperliquid Stock Trades Beat Bitcoin Volume as Dip Buyers Pile In